Is OP_RETURN combined with a hash, appropriate for proof of existence of an asset?
Is OP_RETURN combined with a hash, appropriate for proof of existence of an asset?
I want to store a hash (of a tweet) in a way that is :
- Censorship proof
- Public
- Unchangeable
- Persistent
- Non centralized
- Less expensive as possible, obviously free if possible
Technology offered by the blockchain seems to fit my needs.
Since I don't want to run my own blockchain because I didn't find a way to do it for free (or does it makes sense to run my own blockchain on my own server ?). After reading on the subject, I came up using an existing coin (Bitcoin ?) and as you may guess to the OP_RETURN field in a transaction. But storing my hash in that field is really appropriate ?
Can't I use other coins for that, or create my own coin ?
Since I will store lots (3k/day) of tweets, will it not be expensive to do so ?
https://ift.tt/2ELY0cs
Comments
Post a Comment