Why don't private blockchain networks that do not charge for transactions charge a fee when processing ethereum/ proprietary token on the network?

Why don't private blockchain networks that do not charge for transactions charge a fee when processing ethereum/ proprietary token on the network?

I ask this questions because there seems to be 2 flavors of blockchain: 1. Public think bitcoin and ethereum. 2. Private hyperledger, SAP Leonaro, etc. The public network charges for transactions to incentive nodes to process the transaction. The private network does not charge for transactions which is why it is popular with businesses. Why is there no network that can do both? For example eosio | Blockchain software architecture is trying to make it cheaper to process transactions which I assume is meant to appeal to businesses and consumers. Why cannot a private blockchain such as Hyperledger Sawtooth/ Fabric which are private be free for businesses to use because businesses validate transactions but also accept a token which has value and when a consumer users the token to purchase an item from a business in the network either charge a fee for validating the transaction or do not charge for it.

https://ift.tt/2Ke0SNJ

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tor proxy on Electrum, what does Port: 9150 and 9050 mean?

Tor proxy on Electrum, what does Port: 9150 and 9050 mean? The first time that i installed Electrum i navigated to Tools->Network->Proxy i saw there a checkbox "Use Tor proxy on port 9050", i had a problem with my OS so i had to reinstall my OS, Electrum and Tor, and now instead of "port 9050" it's "port 9150". I think that it's because i'm using the Tor Bundle, as said on this electrum docs , downloaded from here: https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser.html.en#linux i want to know what is the difference between the port "9050" and "9150". And if i'm fine using the "9150". https://ift.tt/2T0EvmY
Read more

How to discover startup flags or command-line options for bitcoind?

How to discover startup flags or command-line options for bitcoind? I'd like to query the Bitcoin daemon (bitcoind) to find out what startup flags (command-line options) were sent to it on startup (or the current state if it has changed, e.g. -server=0/1 changing). For example, I may want to know if -addresstype, -disablewallet, -rescan, or -uacomment=<cmt> or some other flag has been set. Or for Namecoin, it would be very useful to know if -namehistory has been set. Is there an RPC or any other method to find out? Or, to ask the question a different way... src/bitcoind.cpp's bool AppInit(int argc, char* argv[]) method calls ParseParameters(argc, argv);, which is in src/util.cpp. In src/util.cpp we have: map<string, string> mapArgs; static map<string, vector<string> > _mapMultiArgs; const map<string, vector<string> >& mapMultiArgs = _mapMultiArgs; To store flags/options/args. I'd basically just like to get whatever is in tho...
Read more

Can we see Blockchain decentralized data like a mathematical duality or morphisms between representations?

Can we see Blockchain decentralized data like a mathematical duality or morphisms between representations? I prefer to think BLOCKChain in mathematic spaces formulation because we need to understand what is in mathematic terms this 'de-centralization' before. I find this what is decentralization and Wiki-decentralized blockchain My idea is that 'de-centralization' it is not as it appears so I start to use Category Theory to un-lock this 'blocks concept' because there is something that does not come back to me in all this 'inviolability' because we talk about just a simply P2P way (nodes, data,transactions..) 1 propagation 2 over a network 3 but the underlying layer is to the extend that this propagation is represented like a math object and now is useful also to talk about Feynman Propagator of a Scalar Field 1 : like algebraic varieties or manifolds 2 : in this case we talk or Action Functional or about Group Action 3 : This remember in math s...
Read more