What prevents anyone from spending utxos from a native segwit address?

What prevents anyone from spending utxos from a native segwit address?

I read that transactions spending utxos from a native segwit address ( an address starting with bc1) are seen as anyone can spend transactions by legacy nodes.

So what prevents someone from taking a utxo from a native segwit address and using it to fund a transaction with a scriptsig of OP_TRUE or null ,and submitting it to a legacy node or directly to a miner?

https://ift.tt/2GUcG6G

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bitcoin Core errors with database block

Bitcoin Core errors with database block I've had the follow issue: on one machine I've launced Bitcoin Core v0.16.0 and Litecoin Core v0.16.0. Each application work in separate datadir also each application have setted callback call for event walletnotify . For now I use both application with testnets. Recently, there have been frequent cases when these applications stop sending transactions, when restarting, an error occurs: "Corrupted block database detected. Do you whant to rebuild the block database now ?". It happens on both apps Bitcoin Core and Litecoin Core, after rebuild applications continue to work, but after a while it happens again Please help me, what I doing wrong? Thank you for any advice https://ift.tt/2z6j9rL
Read more

sendrawtransaction and txn-mempool-conflict

sendrawtransaction and txn-mempool-conflict When i sendrawtransaction to bitcoind, i get error (exceptions) 18: txn-mempool-conflict (use Bitcoin JSON-RPC denpamusic/php-bitcoinrpc ) But the transaction is sent to the network and is subsequently confirmed. Example one decoded transaction : https://jsfiddle.net/rn58a4j6/ then i send this transaction: 94ec12fc463230b4285a29b047608627c05572a4c6eabe6688a201ce49ae72f7 https://ift.tt/2MY2KP0
Read more